“Beautiful works survive sans virtue. Virtuous works sans beauty do not.” Dave Hickey - The Invisible Dragon.
Contemporary art practice has come to accept art created with an expiration date – art not meant to last forever – especially when it addresses philosophical inquiries such as the nature of mutability and time. Though I've come to respect those who make art which purposefully investigates ideas of temporality, I'm not quite prepared for that in my own practice. I'd rather my art live forever, if possible. I do not have kids. My artworks are my children, my legacy. But what about the art that is more timely than timeless? What about the art that addresses more contemporary concerns? I agree with Hickey in that when an artwork that has outlived its political usefulness, when an artwork's message is no longer relevant, if the art isn't beautiful, if it doesn't make use of aesthetics – that artwork will have a shelf-life; it will slowly fade from memory. Beauty keeps a work alive once it's political impact is blunted.
If I am going to sacrifice aesthetics in my art in the name of serving some political agenda or some other “virtuous” cause, I've got to be damn sure that the cause is worth the sacrifice. I have yet to find that cause. And besides, it has yet to be proven by anyone that a “virtuous” art is made more effective by jettisoning aesthetics. I fact, I firmly believe the opposite – that art is more effective, its message better communicated, when it uses aesthetics. I see no clear reason to abandon beauty. Artists who criticize the use of aesthetics and beauty in art may even be doing so in order to cover for their own lack of talent. It is the barbarian's argument – the whole “I can not read, therefore all books should be burned” argument.
In the end, though, my pondering on the merits and flaws of whether a “virtuous” art is made more effective with or without the use of beauty is inconsequential, considering that so much of contemporary art, especially the art without beauty, is often sarcastic, nihilist, and generally without “virtue.” Perhaps it is fitting that such art is temporary and fated to be forgotten.
Politics are timely, but temporary. Beauty is timeless and eternal.