"Still makes the rest of us look academic." Jackson Pollock.
"How can we live and die and never know the difference?" Clyfford Still.
Clyfford Still was an American painter and a member of the first generation of Abstract Expressionists who made monumental works of art conveying universal aspects of the human condition, such as creation, life, struggle, and death, themes which took on considerable relevance during and immediately following World War II. He was the first among his peers, namely Mark Rothko, Barnett Newman, Willem de Kooning, Jackson Pollock, and others, to break free from representational work and into pure, non-objective abstraction. Still was born in 1904 in Grandin, North Dakota, and spent his childhood in Spokane, Washington, and on the sprawling, wind swept plains of southern Alberta, Canada. The harsh conditions in Canada would color Still's disposition and his approach toward art, fostering his need for solitude and an independent lifestyle. He attended the Art Students League briefly in New York City, but graduated from Spokane University in 1933, and then Washington State College, in 1935. In 1937, Still co-founded the Nespelem Art Colony, where he produced portraits and landscapes of the people and locales on the Colville Indian Reservation.
In 1941, Still relocated to the San Francisco Bay area where he worked in various war industry work to subsidize his pursuit of painting. It was here that Still meet Mark Rothko for the first time, and the two became fast friends. Still would have an influence on both Mark Rothko, and his friend, Barnett Newman, as by this time, Still was already painting pure, non-objective abstract work. In 1943, Still had his first solo show at the San Francisco Museum of Art. From 1943 to 1945, Still taught at the Richmond Professional Institute (now Virginia Commonwealth College), before moving to New York City.
“I want the spectator to be on his own before the paintings, and if he finds in them an imagery unkind or unpleasant or evil, let him look to the state of his own soul.” Clyfford Still.
Clyfford Still lived in New York City for most of the 1950's, at the height of Abstract Expressionism. Even among his peers, Still was considered an outsider. During this time, Still became increasingly critical of the art world. He rejected any attempts by others to explain his art, and began naming his paintings after numbers, letters, and the year made to make interpretation difficult. Still also distanced himself from European Classical and Modernist traditions, believing them to be decadent and profane, and said he came up with abstraction on his own, without any influence from art history. In 1952, Still severed ties with commercial galleries, and refused to show in New York City until 1967, as he felt the city was too corrupt for his work.
In 1961 Clyfford Still distanced himself further from the art world when he moved to a 22 acre farm near Westminster, Maryland, where he would paint in the barn during the warmer months. Five years later, Still would purchase a house eight miles away, in New Windsor, Maryland, where he would live until his death in 1980.
“You can turn the lights out. The paintings will carry their own fire.” Clyfford Still.
Clyfford Still's work, like those of his peers Mark Rothko and Barnett Newman, is largely concerned with juxtaposing different colors and surfaces. Unlike Rothko and Newman, whose work is organized in a relatively simple way (Rothko's rectangular shapes and Newman's single, vertical zip), Still's compositions are less regular, and are, perhaps, more organic. His jagged flashes of color can leave one with the impression that one layer of color was torn off the canvas, to reveal the colors underneath. Still also departs from Rothko and Newman in how he applies his paint. Rothko and Newman used flat, thinned paints, where Still used thick, impasto paints, often applied with palette knives, causing a subtle variety of shades and sheen which shimmer across the canvas.
Still's large, mature work recalls natural forms and phenomena; the ancient stalagmites, mysterious caverns, foliage, and canyons bathed in darkness and light give the impression of the poetic sublime. His vast, expansive canvases seem to go on forever and overwhelm the viewer, and it seems Still could have painted forever, if it were not for the edges of the painting. Still once remarked that it was "intolerable to be stopped by a frame's edge." Often Still's work seem to echo the earth tones and open spaces of the Western Plains where he grew up (although Still, true to his irascible nature, would deny any connections between his art and the natural landscape).
Philosophically, the work might also reveal Still's obsession with the dualism of good and evil, as symbolized through his use of light and dark, although, most likely, Still would deny that, too. As an artist, Still's difficulty and propensity for being a loner is on par with William Blake and Albert Pinkham Ryder.
Like Rothko and some of his Abstract Expressionist contemporaries, Still believed that his art had a living spirit and that it contained magic. He believed his art was more than just the sum of their parts. “I never wanted color to be color. I never wanted texture to be texture, or images to become shapes. I wanted them all to fuse together into a living spirit.”
Still, like many of the first generation of Abstract Expressionists, was not interested in painting the specifics of his time, but instead interested in creating timeless, universal work, appealing to mankind's inner mythologies. Still distrusted science, technology, and the works of man, especially after the invention of the atomic bomb, and wanted to produce work to counteract the damage done to humanity by them. "I am not interested in illustrating my time. A man's "time" limits him, it does not truly liberate him. Our age - it is one of science, of mechanism, of power and death. I see no point in adding to its mechanism of power and death. I see no point in adding to its mammoth arrogance the compliment of a graphic homage."
In his will, written in 1978, two years before his death, Still left a portion of his work and his complete archives to his wife, Patricia, but left the rest any “American city that will agree to build or assign and maintain permanent quarters exclusively for these works of art and assure their physical survival with the explicit requirement that none of these works of art will be sold, given, or exchanged but are to be retained in the place described above exclusively assigned to them in perpetuity for exhibition and study.” After Still's death in 1980, the Still collection of approximately 2,400 works was sealed off completely from public and scholarly access for more than two decades. Finally, in August 2004, the city of Denver, Colorado announced that they would, with Patricia's blessing, receive Still's artworks and build a museum for them. Patricia also bequeathed her own collection of paintings and the complete archives to the museum as well. The Clyfford Still Museum opened to the public in 2010. It contains approximately 3,125 works of art completed between 1920 and 1980, 95 percent of Clyfford Still's lifetime artistic output.
Clyfford Still's art was noble in nature. He spent his career focused on human aspiration, the personal search for identity, and the liberation of the spirit. It was a path from which he never strayed. To me, Clyfford Still's art is emblematic of a life lived with no compromise and the maintenance of personal integrity. I think more contemporary artists should look to Clyfford Still as an example of an artistic life well lived.
“I affirm my profound concern to achieve a purpose beyond vanity, ambition, or remembrance.” Clyfford Still.